Arpa-E Model Cooperative Agreement

If a Federally Funded Research and Development Centre (FFRDC) or State Laboratory (GOGO) is the lead organization of a project team, ARPA-E implements a funding agreement directly with the FFRDC or GOGO and a single separate cooperation agreement with the rest of the project team. Regardless of the use of several agreements, the FFRDC or GOGO is the leading organization for the entire project, including all work performed by the FFRDC or GOGO and the rest of the project team. – Work authorization – Financial instrument used when a federally funded research and development centre (FFRDC) is a DEE laboratory in a project team. The work authorization is executed directly with the DOE laboratory separately from the cooperation agreement with the other team members. – Inter-institutional agreement (ILO) – Agreement between two government agencies (excluding DOE National Labs). If a lab (non-DOE) is a member of the project team, ARPA-E can run an ILO directly with the non-DOE National Lab entity. A unique, separate cooperation agreement is implemented with the other entities of the project team. – Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) – An agreement between a non-federal entity (i.e. the private/scientific sector) and a federal laboratory.

All federal funds go to the premium recipient and the premium recipient is responsible for making the funds allocated to the sub-receiver (laboratory) available. ARPA-E. 2016c. ARPA-E: The first seven years: a sample of the project (available April 26, 2017). Cannady, C. 2013. Technology licensing and development agreements. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. In particular, Mr. Kovacs noted that although BARDA technically adopted under the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act of 2006, OTA was never used by the program. Instead, Kovacs offered models and lessons learned from the barda experience that allowed FAR to promote innovation and development. ARPA-E.